News
Anorectal Expulsion Balloon Catheter (SR1B) in Pelvic Floor Practice: BET Protocol, Dyssynergia Diagnosis, and Biofeedback Guidance
UROGYNECOLOGY Anorectal Expulsion Balloon Catheter (SR1B) in Pelvic Floor Practice: BET Protocol, Dyssynergia Diagnosis, and Biofeedback Guidance CincyMed Clinical Resource · 9 min read TL;DR — Key Takeaways The anorectal balloon expulsion test (BET) using the SR1B catheter is a recommended first-line diagnostic tool for pelvic floor dyssynergia and defecatory dysfunction in constipated patients who have failed laxative therapy [ACG Guidelines 2021]. BET is performed by inflating the SR1B balloon with 50 mL of air or warm water in the rectum; inability to expel within 1–2 minutes indicates abnormal evacuation and warrants further pelvic floor evaluation. The SR1B catheter is single-use, latex-free, and filled with air — designed for reproducible, standardized testing across pelvic floor and colorectal practices. BET combined with anorectal manometry (ARM) confirms dyssynergic defecation with high specificity, guiding referral to pelvic floor biofeedback therapy — the recommended first-line treatment [ACG 2021; Rao et al., Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022]. CincyMed supplies the SR1B Anorectal Expulsion Balloon Catheter for pelvic floor clinics, colorectal surgery suites, and urogynecology practices with same-week fulfillment and transparent pricing. For pelvic floor specialists evaluating patients with obstructed defecation, chronic constipation, or suspected dyssynergia, the balloon expulsion test (BET) using the SR1B Anorectal Expulsion Balloon Catheter is a fast, low-cost, office-based procedure that provides an objective measure of rectoanal coordination — and is endorsed by both the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) as a required component of defecatory disorder diagnosis. Pelvic floor dysfunction encompasses a spectrum of conditions affecting bladder, bowel, and pelvic organ support. Among bowel-related complaints, defecatory dysfunction — including dyssynergic defecation — is frequently underdiagnosed because clinicians rely on symptom questionnaires alone. Studies estimate that among patients with refractory constipation referred to specialist centers, 40–60% have a measurable defecatory disorder on anorectal testing [Bharucha AE, Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022]. The SR1B balloon catheter brings the diagnostic precision needed to identify these patients and direct them to the right treatment. What Is Dyssynergic Defecation and Why Does It Matter for Pelvic Floor Practice? Dyssynergic Defecation — Clinical Definition Dyssynergic defecation (also called anismus, pelvic floor dyssynergia, or functional defecation disorder) is characterized by paradoxical contraction or failure to relax the puborectalis muscle and external anal sphincter during attempted defecation. Rather than opening to allow passage of stool, the pelvic floor tightens — creating a functional outlet obstruction. It is diagnosed by anorectal manometry demonstrating increased anal pressure on straining, combined with an abnormal balloon expulsion test [Bharucha AE et al., Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022; ACG Clinical Guidelines 2021]. Patients with dyssynergic defecation present with symptoms overlapping several pelvic floor conditions: straining, incomplete evacuation, need for manual assistance, pelvic pressure, and chronic constipation. These patients often present first to urogynecology or pelvic floor physical therapy, not gastroenterology — making familiarity with the balloon expulsion test essential across specialties. The ACG Clinical Guidelines on Benign Anorectal Disorders (2021) state clearly: "ARM and balloon expulsion are required to diagnose defecatory disorder (DD)." The BET adds important information that symptoms and digital rectal examination cannot provide alone — an objective, quantifiable measure of the patient's ability to coordinate the anorectum during simulated defecation. The SR1B Anorectal Expulsion Balloon Catheter: Device Overview The SR1B is a single-use, air-filled anorectal expulsion balloon catheter designed for bedside use in outpatient clinic settings. Key device characteristics: Single-use, sterile: Eliminates cross-contamination risk; no reprocessing required Latex-free: Safe for patients with latex sensitivity, consistent with IAPWG equipment recommendations Air-filled design: Compliant balloon accommodates variable rectal compliance without over-distension Catheter size: Suitable for atraumatic insertion in the left lateral decubitus position Compatible with standard BET protocols: Can be used standalone or in conjunction with anorectal manometry systems The IAPWG recommends the use of a flexible catheter up to 16 Fr with a non-latex, compliant balloon for BET — a specification the SR1B meets. Their consensus statement specifies 50 mL of tepid water as the standard fill volume, with the patient seated on a commode for expulsion [Carrington EV et al., Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020]. Step-by-Step BET Protocol Using the SR1B Catheter Step Action Clinical Notes 1. Patient Preparation Optional cleansing enema 1–2 hours before; change to gown; digital rectal exam to exclude fecal loading DRE also provides baseline assessment of sphincter tone and pelvic floor contraction 2. Positioning Left lateral decubitus with hips and knees flexed Standard insertion position per IAPWG and ACG protocols 3. Catheter Insertion Lubricate SR1B; gently insert balloon into rectum so balloon is fully above anal canal Avoid forceful insertion; confirm patient comfort 4. Balloon Inflation Inflate with 50 mL of air (SR1B air-filled protocol) or tepid water per institutional protocol Some labs inflate to the patient's first urge to defecate rather than fixed volume — particularly useful when rectal sensation is reduced 5. Expulsion Phase Transfer patient to seated commode; instruct to expel balloon privately; start timer Privacy is important — patient inhibition in front of clinical staff can produce false-positive results 6. Interpretation Normal: expulsion within 1 minute. Abnormal: failure to expel within 1–2 minutes (lab-dependent cutoff) ACG recommends >2 min as the upper limit of normal for air-filled balloon; some labs use 1 min for water-filled Interpreting BET Results in Pelvic Floor Practice An abnormal BET (failure to expel within the cutoff time) has high specificity for dyssynergic defecation, with specificity estimates reaching 87% when combined with ARM [Bharucha AE, Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022]. Sensitivity is more variable, meaning a normal BET does not entirely exclude DD — particularly in patients with reduced rectal sensation who may not generate adequate propulsive force with a fixed 50 mL volume. For pelvic floor physical therapists, the BET provides a measurable baseline and a trackable endpoint. Research shows that biofeedback therapy — the gold-standard treatment for dyssynergic defecation — can be monitored in part by reassessing balloon expulsion time at follow-up visits. Successful biofeedback correlates with normalization of the dyssynergic pattern and reduction in balloon expulsion time [Rao SS et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2007]. BET in the Pelvic Floor Multidisciplinary Context Clinical Setting Role of SR1B BET Next Step if Abnormal Urogynecology Screen for defecatory dysfunction in patients with pelvic organ prolapse or mixed pelvic floor complaints ARM ± defecography; referral to pelvic floor PT or colorectal Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Baseline and follow-up measure of rectal evacuation coordination; used alongside rectal balloon training Biofeedback therapy (4–6 sessions); retesting at completion Colorectal Surgery Pre-operative assessment; exclude DD before considering surgical intervention for constipation MR defecography if BET and ARM are discordant Women's Health / Obstetrics Assess anorectal function following obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI); evaluate fecal incontinence risk Endoanal ultrasound; ARM; pelvic floor PT referral It is worth noting that the BET is also used in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Among women who have sustained obstetric anal sphincter injury, reduced perineal descent during defecation — assessable with the BET and complementary imaging — is an independent risk factor for fecal incontinence [Bharucha AE et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2012, PMC3509345]. Recognizing impaired evacuation in these patients reinforces the need for pelvic floor retraining rather than surgery alone. Biofeedback and Rectal Balloon Training: Closing the Loop The SR1B catheter is not only a diagnostic tool — it is also used therapeutically. In pelvic floor physical therapy, rectal balloon training involves inserting an inflated catheter balloon and guiding the patient to coordinate abdominal pressure with pelvic floor relaxation, simulating normal defecation mechanics. This sensory retraining is used alongside EMG biofeedback to restore rectoanal coordination. A randomized controlled trial published in the Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology (2011, PMC3043010) compared balloon-assisted training to EMG biofeedback in 65 patients with dyssynergic defecation. Both approaches reduced constipation symptoms, with patient satisfaction reaching 52% in the balloon training arm and 79% in the biofeedback arm — confirming that balloon training has a meaningful therapeutic role even when biofeedback is unavailable or not tolerated. Frequently Asked Questions What is the normal balloon expulsion time for the SR1B catheter? For an air-filled balloon, the ACG Clinical Guidelines (2021) recommend using a cutoff of greater than 2 minutes as the upper limit of normal. Some institutions use 1 minute for water-filled balloons. Results should always be interpreted in the context of the specific catheter type, fill volume, and patient position used — protocols are not fully interchangeable across devices. Can the SR1B be used for both diagnosis and biofeedback training? The SR1B is a single-use device intended for diagnostic balloon expulsion testing. For ongoing rectal balloon training sessions in physical therapy, your clinical team should use an appropriate reusable or per-session biofeedback balloon system. The SR1B provides the standardized baseline test from which a training protocol is built. Does a normal balloon expulsion test rule out dyssynergic defecation? No. The BET has high specificity but variable sensitivity. Some patients with documented dyssynergia on ARM can still expel the balloon — particularly those with reduced rectal sensation who do not generate adequate propulsive pressure at 50 mL. ACG guidelines recommend combined ARM plus BET for definitive diagnosis. Defecography may be needed when BET and ARM are discordant. Is pelvic floor preparation required before the BET? A cleansing enema 1–2 hours before the test is optional but recommended by most labs, primarily for patient comfort and to prevent fecal loading from confounding insertion. A digital rectal examination should always be performed before catheter insertion to exclude fecal loading and assess baseline sphincter tone and pelvic floor function. Need instruments for this procedure? CincyMed supplies surgical and endoscopy instruments for hospitals and ASCs. Browse Our Catalog References Bharucha AE, Knowles CH, Mack I, et al. Diagnostic Strategy and Tools for Identifying Defecatory Disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022;51(1):77–91. PMC8829054. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8829054/ Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Management of Benign Anorectal Disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(10):2128–2148. https://www.spg.pt/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ACG-Clinical-Guidelines-Management-of-Benign-Anorectal-Disorders.pdf Carrington EV, Heinrich H, Knowles CH, et al. The International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London Classification for disorders of anorectal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(1):e13679. https://www.gastroenterologyadvisor.com/features/iapwg-recommendations-for-testing-and-classification-of-anorectal-function/ Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(3):331–338. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4087765/ Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Melton LJ, Zinsmeister AR. Obstetric trauma, pelvic floor injury and fecal incontinence: A population-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(6):902–911. PMC3509345. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3509345/ Chiarioni G, Whitehead WE, Pezza V, et al. Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(3):657–664. PMC4087765. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4087765/ Ahadi T, Madjlesi F, Mahjoubi B, et al. Comparing the efficacy of biofeedback and balloon-assisted training in the treatment of dyssynergic defecation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(2):89–92. PMC3043010. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043010/ Minguez M, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, et al. How to Perform and Interpret Balloon Expulsion Test. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;20(3):393–402. PMC4102152. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4102152/
Read moreNews
OR Setup for Urogynecology: Instrument Tray Setup and Sterilization Workflow
UROGYNECOLOGY OR Setup for Urogynecology: Instrument Tray Setup and Sterilization Workflow CincyMed Clinical Resource · 8 min read A well-organized urogynecology OR — with correctly assembled case carts, standardized tray templates, and a reliable sterile processing workflow — directly reduces case delays, instrument errors, and preventable patient safety events. The reverse is equally true: a disorganized instrument management system in a busy urogynecology program produces constant downstream friction — missing instruments, incomplete trays, wrong-size components, and SPD bottlenecks that cascade through the day's case schedule. This post provides a systematic guide to urogynecology OR instrument tray setup and sterilization workflow, written for OR managers, sterile processing supervisors, and ASC administrators building or auditing their urogynecology instrument management system. Tray Architecture: Procedure-Specific vs. Universal Trays The first decision in urogynecology tray design is whether to build procedure-specific trays, universal base trays with modular add-ons, or a hybrid approach. Each has merits depending on case volume, procedure mix, and SPD capacity. Procedure-specific trays contain all instruments required for a single procedure type. Advantages: tray contents are optimized for the procedure; SPD staff and OR nurses have clear, unambiguous tray-to-procedure mapping; missing items are identified at tray build, not at case start. Disadvantages: more tray types to manage, more storage, and more sterilization capacity required for a diverse procedure mix. Universal base tray + modular add-ons: A core laparoscopic tray covering the shared instrumentation (trocars, graspers, scissors, energy device, suction-irrigator, laparoscope) is supplemented by procedure-specific instrument modules (sacrocolpopexy suturing module, hysterectomy colpotomy module, Burch retropubic module). Advantages: fewer total trays in circulation, reduced storage footprint. Disadvantages: assembly complexity increases; modular add-ons can be omitted in error. Recommended approach for most urogynecology programs: A hybrid model — procedure-specific trays for the highest-volume procedures (vaginal prolapse repair tray, laparoscopic hysterectomy tray, cystoscopy tray) with shared universal laparoscopic trays supplemented by modular packs for specialized procedures (sacrocolpopexy, Burch). Standard Urogynecology Tray Templates The following are reference tray templates for the most common urogynecology procedures. OR managers should adapt these to their facility's surgeon preference cards. Vaginal prolapse repair tray (anterior/posterior colporrhaphy): Weighted Auvard speculum (medium, large): ×1 each Breisky-Navratil retractors (25, 30, 35 mm): ×2 eachSims retractor: ×1 Allis clamps: ×6 Heaney needle drivers (8–9 inch): ×2 pairs Mayo scissors (straight, 7 inch): ×1 Metzenbaum scissors (curved): ×1 Long DeBakey forceps: ×2 Ring forceps: ×2 Deschamps ligature carrier (L/R): ×1 pairMonopolar electrocautery pencil: ×1 Irrigation syringe and basin: ×1 Laparoscopic urogynecology tray (base): 10–12 mm trocar: ×15 mm trocars: ×310 mm 30° laparoscope: ×1 Atraumatic graspers (5 mm): ×2 Maryland dissector (5 mm): ×1 Monopolar L-hook electrode (5 mm): ×1 Fine-tipped bipolar forceps (5 mm): ×1 Suction-irrigator (5 mm): ×1 Laparoscopic scissors (5 mm): ×1 Sacrocolpopexy add-on module: Long laparoscopic needle drivers (36–40 cm): ×2 Atraumatic mesh-handling grasper (5 mm, atraumatic jaw): ×1 Blunt probe: ×1 Cystoscopy tray: 30° cystoscope telescope: × 170° cystoscope telescope: ×1 Cystoscope sheath (17–22 Fr): ×2 Bridge/obturator: ×1 Light cable: ×1 (inspect before every case) Hysteroscopy tray: 4 mm 30° rigid hysteroscope: ×1 Continuous-flow diagnostic sheath (6–7 mm OD): ×1 Operative sheath (7–9 mm OD) with working channel: ×1 Working-channel instruments: biopsy forceps ×1, scissors ×1, grasper ×1 Light cable: ×1 Sterilization Method Selection by Instrument Type Sterilization method selection must match the instrument's material and thermal tolerance. Using the wrong sterilization method damages instruments, voids manufacturer warranties, and creates patient safety risk. Steam autoclave (134°C, 3–4 min; or 121°C, 15–30 min): Appropriate for stainless steel retractors, clamps, scissors, needle drivers, specula, and autoclave-validated metal instruments. Not appropriate for camera heads, light cables, or instruments with electronic components. Low-temperature hydrogen peroxide plasma (Sterrad): Appropriate for laparoscopes, hysteroscopes, camera couplers, flexible scopes (manufacturer must confirm compatibility), and instruments with lumens >1 mm (confirm lumen length/diameter limits with Sterrad cycle specifications). Not appropriate for cellulose-based materials (gauze, paper) or liquids. High-level disinfection (Cidex OPA or equivalent, 20-minute soak): Used for cystoscopes, rigid hysteroscopes, and flexible scopes when sterilization is not required by the specific clinical indication and when turnaround time requires faster reprocessing. HLD is not sterilization — it does not achieve the same level of microbial kill. Use sterilization (steam or low-temperature) wherever possible. Ethylene oxide (EtO): Used for items that cannot withstand steam or hydrogen peroxide plasma (certain camera systems, some energy cables). Long cycle time (8–12 hours + aeration) limits use to overnight or weekend reprocessing. SPD Workflow Integration for Urogynecology Programs Efficient SPD workflow for urogynecology requires: Tray tracking: Every instrument tray should have a unique identifier (barcode or RFID tag) linking it to its contents list, last sterilization date, cycle parameters, and responsible SPD technician. Instrument tracking systems (Censitrac, SPM, or similar) provide this capability. Programs without instrument tracking systems have no way to audit tray completeness or investigate missing instrument events. Tray inspection protocol: After each decontamination cycle and before sterilization, a designated SPD technician inspects every instrument for function (scissors sharpness, needle driver jaw grip, ratchet function, clamp alignment) and completeness against the tray template. Items that fail inspection are pulled from the tray and sent for repair. Prioritization system: Urogynecology instrument trays used in morning cases must be decontaminated, dried, inspected, reassembled, and sterilized the same day (or previous evening) to be available for next-day cases. Programs with a 7 AM first case start cannot rely on same-morning sterilization of prior-day trays. Establish a cutoff time for last-case tray decontamination (typically 6–8 hours before first-case start, depending on sterilization method). Loaner instrument management: When facility instruments are unavailable (in repair, damaged, lost), loaner instruments from the supplier must be documented, inspected, and sterilized before OR use. Unsterilized loaner instruments cannot be introduced into the sterile field regardless of the supplier's representations. Pre-Case Instrument Checklist Every urogynecology OR team should verify the following before case start — preferably during room setup, not at time of draping: 1. Correct tray(s) on the back table — confirm against the day's schedule and surgeon preference card 2. All instruments accounted for against the tray template (count verified) 3. Disposables on the case cart: trocars, suture, sling kit, mesh, or procedure-specific consumables 4. Energy device connected and tested (monopolar, bipolar, ultrasonic — as applicable) 5. Camera system functional — white balance, focus, light source output confirmed 6. Irrigation system set up — fluid bags connected, tubing primed, pump tested 7. Cystoscopy equipment in the room (for any procedure requiring it) 8. Uterine manipulator sized and assembled (for laparoscopic cases) 9. Specimen bags and labels available 10. Fascial closure device on the cart (for 12 mm port closure) This checklist, laminated and posted in each urogynecology OR, takes 90 seconds to complete and eliminates the majority of preventable case delays in high-volume programs. Frequently Asked Questions How should urogynecology instrument trays be organized for maximum OR efficiency? Build procedure-specific tray templates for your highest-volume procedures. Maintain a laminated instrument list inside each tray lid for quick verification. Separate delicate optical instruments (scopes, camera couplers) into dedicated containers — never tray with metal instruments. Standardize tray configurations across all ORs in the facility so that instruments are always in the same position relative to the surgeon's side of the field. What is the correct sterilization method for laparoscopes and hysteroscopes? Most rigid laparoscopes and hysteroscopes are compatible with low-temperature hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization (Sterrad). Confirm scope lumen diameter and length compatibility with the specific Sterrad model in use. Many scopes are also autoclave-compatible at 134°C per manufacturer validation — check the IFU for each scope before sterilizing. Camera heads and light cables should use low-temperature sterilization only. How many instrument trays should a urogynecology OR maintain? A minimum of 1.5 × the number of simultaneous ORs running urogynecology cases. A single OR running two simultaneous cases (one laparoscopic, one vaginal) needs at minimum two of each tray type — one in use, one either sterile and ready or in SPD turnaround. Programs with high case volumes or evening case schedules need greater redundancy (2× or 3× for their highest-volume trays). What should happen when an instrument is discovered missing at case start? The missing instrument should be reported to the charge nurse and SPD immediately. If the case can proceed safely without it, document the missing item and continue — do not borrow from another OR's sterile tray. If the instrument is critical for the planned procedure, delay case start until it is obtained and sterilized. Every missing instrument event should trigger an SPD audit to determine root cause (tray assembly error, instrument disposal with draping, or theft/loss) and corrective action. How often should urogynecology instrument trays be audited? Tray contents should be physically audited against the master template at minimum quarterly — more frequently (monthly) in high-volume programs. Instrument count discrepancies should trigger an immediate audit. After any instrument loss or damage event, the affected tray should be fully re-inventoried before returning to service. Reach out to our team at sales@cincymed.com for instrument recommendations, quotes, or bulk pricing. Need instruments for this procedure? CincyMed supplies surgical and endoscopy instruments for hospitals and ASCs. Browse Our Catalog
How Pessary Selection Works: A Clinical Guide for Pelvic Floor Specialists
UROGYNECOLOGY How Pessary Selection Works: A Clinical Guide for Pelvic Floor Specialists CincyMed Clinical Resource · 3 min read Pessary selection is both a science and a clinical art. The goal of any pessary selection guide is to match pessary type and size to the patient's specific pelvic floor defect, prolapse stage, activity level, and ability to perform self-management. Getting selection right maximizes symptom relief, minimizes displacement, and reduces the need for repeat fitting appointments. What Is a Pessary? A pessary is a removable intravaginal device inserted to support the pelvic organs and/or provide a urethral compression point for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Pessaries are manufactured from medical-grade silicone (non-latex, MRI-compatible) in a range of shapes and sizes. They are a first-line, non-surgical treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and SUI and are appropriate for patients who decline surgery, are poor surgical candidates, or desire conservative management during fertility planning. Pessary Types and Clinical Indications Pessary Type Design Primary Indication Self-Management Ring (with or without support) Flexible ring; flat or with membrane Stage I–II uterine prolapse, cystocele, SUI (incontinence dish variant) Easy; patient-removable Gehrung Bent ring; arch configuration Cystocele and rectocele; combined anterior and posterior defect Moderate; requires instruction Gellhorn Flat base with central stem and drainage holes Stage III–IV prolapse; procidentia; post-hysterectomy vault prolapse Difficult; usually provider-managed Donut (Torus) Thick, doughnut-shaped ring Complete uterine prolapse; short or stenotic vaginal vault Difficult; usually provider-managed Cube Cube with concave sides; suction retention Advanced prolapse with poor perineal body support; low vaginal tone Daily removal required; not for long-term wear Incontinence Dish / Ring Ring with urethral support knob Stress urinary incontinence without significant prolapse Easy; patient-removable Shaatz Similar to Gellhorn without stem; disc with perforations Advanced prolapse; alternative to Gellhorn for patients who cannot tolerate stem Provider-managed Sizing Principles Pessary sizing is determined by clinical examination and trial fitting — not by POP-Q stage alone. The cardinal rule is that the correctly fitted pessary should remain in place during Valsalva, ambulation, and voiding, without causing discomfort, urinary retention, or rectal pressure. The examiner should be able to insert one finger between the pessary and vaginal wall to confirm adequate fit without excessive compression of vaginal epithelium. Ring pessaries are typically sized 2–5 (corresponding to roughly 51–89 mm diameter) and are the best starting point for most patients — their flexibility tolerates a range of vault dimensions, and their ease of self-management maximizes patient adherence. Begin fitting with the ring and escalate to a support or space-filling design only if the ring fails to control symptoms. Patient Selection and Counseling The best candidates for self-managed pessaries (ring, incontinence dish) are patients with good manual dexterity, access to follow-up care, and Stage I–II prolapse. Provider-managed pessaries (Gellhorn, donut, cube) are appropriate for patients with advanced prolapse, limited manual dexterity, or narrow introital access. At each follow-up — typically every 3 months — examine the vaginal epithelium for erosion, discharge, or granulation tissue that may indicate excessive pessary pressure. Patients using hormone therapy (vaginal estrogen) have improved epithelial integrity and better pessary tolerance. For postmenopausal patients with atrophic vaginitis, local vaginal estrogen is a useful adjunct to pessary use when not contraindicated. View CincyMed's complete range of pessaries and our urogynecology instrument page for full product details. The American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) publishes patient resources and clinical guidelines on pessary fitting that complement this selection framework. Conclusion A systematic approach to pessary selection — beginning with prolapse stage, adding patient anatomy and self-management capacity, and starting with the simplest effective device — allows clinicians to fit the majority of patients successfully at the first or second appointment. Ring pessaries cover the widest indication range; Gellhorn and donut designs address advanced prolapse; cube pessaries are reserved for refractory cases requiring maximum retention force. Regular follow-up and patient education are as important as device selection to achieving durable outcomes. Need instruments for this procedure? CincyMed supplies surgical and endoscopy instruments for hospitals and ASCs. Browse Our Catalog